Hi I just noticed that before my talk on how to actually run the process flow, there are already two videos planned here, on Coriolis and eFabless, which means, all the tools I've mentioned would be also provided in our toolchain will already be introduced, so there's really no need for me to repeat stuff from the other two videos, Ferenc: https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/room/dopen_hardware
I will keep making videos however and will upload them to this dedicated channel, and then embed them on the website: https://odysee.com/@LibreSilicon:8
BTW: Would be cool, if you'd be looking into Kdenlive as well and would as well get a hang on video editing, so that I'm not the only one producing content :-)
Cheers -lev
On Friday, January 21, 2022 1:41:45 AM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Hello David,
I reviewed the talk. It is mostly OK. However, as usual, I have some recommendations (if it fits into the deadline):
At 03:04, it is stated that would-be small startups are the intended users of the process (and also implied as the means of "small players" to access the technology). This is a good approach at first, as this puts a real-life check on the economic feasibility of providing a small-scale manufacturing service. But it raises the following question: entrepreneurs will try this if it seems to be economically viable, if demand is already there, but the demand will remain latent as long as no-one tries to provide it (since low-volume custom manufacturing is now considered to be infeasible, which is a cardinal blocking point in itself). How to resolve this chicken-and-egg? Maybe we will use our would-be lab to become a pilot provider? Whether yes or no, this contradiction and the way to resolve it should be mentioned here (referred as with the buzzword "driving the paradigm shift"/"Drive the adoption of these nodes"/"Elaborate novel business models" on the website).
As for the website: our roadmap (with the demos) didn't show up. Is it intentional?
At 03:42, I think, the part beginning with the taxpayer money up to the sticks in Italian is too political, falling in the same category of why the logo is blurred in the release version.
At 05:42, the book invokes for me the proverb "Who knows and understands, does it, who knows but doesn't understand, teaches it, who neither knows nor understands, writes a book of it". I would advertise it only if it is on the print...
At 26:18, I would also mention vacuum evaporation. Not as simple in construction as sputtering, but it's a much older technology (so easier to find second-hand equipment) and also simpler to design I suppose.
Regards,
Ferenc
On 1/20/22 19:52, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
OK!
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 6:10:13 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Thanks. It works now. I will check it out now and give feedback today if I see anything.
On 1/20/22 18:37, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
Hi I've uploaded it to Odysee after rerending with a sharper version of my logo. My logo contains some examples of topics I'm talking about on my channel, and some people at FOSDEM might become triggered and ree around, so I blurred it out for the FOSDEM talk. On Odysee is the version with the proper logo :-)
This will be the link, as soon as Odysee is done processing it: https://odysee.com/talk:e74c460befe30336690a7f3fc4316bd82bda4250
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:05:19 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Hello Everyone,
"I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines..." Physical processing of silicon, as any other material, is supposed to be dangerous and videos in the topic are supposed to describe chemicals. I think it is time to do what is already done for email and repository hosting: fire up a mediagoblin[1] instance within the libresilicon.com domain.
Regards,
Ferenc
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaGoblin
On 1/20/22 16:50, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines... not my fault. I'm right now syncing it to Odysee. I'll tell you when it's done and post you the link
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:11:12 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote: > The problem is not with access control, but the way it's implemented. > If > we don't want to disclose in advance, just make it private and > distribute the link in PM to those who it may concerns. BTW, with age > restriction, it's still viewable by anyone who don't bother spraying > personal information to everywhere... > > On 1/20/22 13:04, lkcl wrote: >> On January 20, 2022 12:00:01 PM UTC, "Ferenc Éger" >> eegerferenc@gmail.com
wrote: >>> Hello David, >>> >>> >>> Can you please make it available in a way that i don't have to show >>> ID >>> or creditcard to google? >> >> that will be FOSDEM2022 which is 5-6 february, here is the schedule: >> https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/track/libre_open_vlsi_and_fpga/ >> >> l.
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers