Hello.
Sorry, for my delay. I double-checked the mask and find two oddities.
1st, I saw a long small opening gap in metal2 on the PAD measurement. 2nd, I stumbled about a DRC error which I does not see every Magic run. Well, it was the metal2 output of the T7_INV Ring Oscillator; heavy to find.
Both are fixed now and checked in.
@David, please pull, re-generate the mask and get them out of the door!
Thanks all for your help on PearlRiver!
Regards, Hagen.
On 11/25/18 12:20 PM, Éger Ferenc wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I re-checked the masks. It is correct now. From my side it can be sent in, but please someone else check it too (more-eyes principle).
Regards, Ferenc
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 8:02 AM David Lanzendörfer <david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch mailto:david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch> wrote:
Hello Ferenc I updated the masks according to your feedback. Please have a look at it once again. Cheers David On Saturday, 24 November 2018 9:11:27 PM HKT Éger Ferenc wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I checked the masks. The overall result is Not OK. The detailed problems are > the following: - via1, 2, contact oversized (what shall be 5um is 9um) > - nimplant, pimplant undersized (shall 20 is 12) > - silicideblock, implantblock undersized (shall 15 is 7) > - sti oversized (shall 35 is 39) > - sonos oversized (shall 12.5 is 8.5) > Other layers (glass, fox, pwell, nwell, pbase, nbase, poly, metal1, 2, 3) > are OK. > > The first two points remind me some troubles we had initially but got > rectified later. Maybe this is a leftover from them? Also, I would add some > identification (one or two letters) to the masks as it is pretty confusing > to handle them separately (especially implantblock and silicideblock are > almost the same). We have some free space in the middle for that. > > Regards, > Ferenc
Libre-silicon-devel mailing list Libre-silicon-devel@list.libresilicon.com http://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libre-silicon-devel