Hello Everyone,

I re-checked the masks. It is correct now. From my side it can be sent in, but please someone else check it too (more-eyes principle).

Regards,
Ferenc


On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 8:02 AM David Lanzendörfer <david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch> wrote:
Hello Ferenc
I updated the masks according to your feedback.
Please have a look at it once again.

Cheers
        David

On Saturday, 24 November 2018 9:11:27 PM HKT Éger Ferenc wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I checked the masks. The overall result is Not OK. The detailed problems are
> the following: - via1, 2, contact oversized (what shall be 5um is 9um)
> - nimplant, pimplant undersized (shall 20 is 12)
> - silicideblock, implantblock undersized (shall 15 is 7)
> - sti oversized (shall 35 is 39)
> - sonos oversized (shall 12.5 is 8.5)
> Other layers (glass, fox, pwell, nwell, pbase, nbase, poly, metal1, 2, 3)
> are OK.
>
> The first two points remind me some troubles we had initially but got
> rectified later. Maybe this is a leftover from them? Also, I would add some
> identification (one or two letters) to the masks as it is pretty confusing
> to handle them separately (especially implantblock and silicideblock are
> almost the same). We have some free space in the middle for that.
>
> Regards,
> Ferenc