Hi Here's the video... Took me three days... in some takes I'm so exhausted that I can't even talk anymore and sound as if I'd be drunk, in others I'm nearly crying... BUT I'm finally done recording and cutting everything! YES!
Please leave me a like :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C1P83oO57k&ab_channel=TheLeviathan
Cheers -lev
For some reason YouTube totally f-ed up my webcam resolution during upload... The uploaded video on the FOSDEM website has a better resolution.
Enjoy anyway :-)
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 7:30:48 AM WET David Lanzendörfer wrote:
Hi Here's the video... Took me three days... in some takes I'm so exhausted that I can't even talk anymore and sound as if I'd be drunk, in others I'm nearly crying... BUT I'm finally done recording and cutting everything! YES!
Please leave me a like :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C1P83oO57k&ab_channel=TheLeviathan
Cheers -lev
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Hello David,
Can you please make it available in a way that i don't have to show ID or creditcard to google?
Regards,
Ferenc
On 1/20/22 08:30, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
Hi Here's the video... Took me three days... in some takes I'm so exhausted that I can't even talk anymore and sound as if I'd be drunk, in others I'm nearly crying... BUT I'm finally done recording and cutting everything! YES!
Please leave me a like :D
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C1P83oO57k&ab_channel=TheLeviathan
Cheers -lev
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
On January 20, 2022 12:00:01 PM UTC, "Ferenc Éger" eegerferenc@gmail.com wrote:
Hello David,
Can you please make it available in a way that i don't have to show ID or creditcard to google?
that will be FOSDEM2022 which is 5-6 february, here is the schedule: https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/track/libre_open_vlsi_and_fpga/
l.
The problem is not with access control, but the way it's implemented. If we don't want to disclose in advance, just make it private and distribute the link in PM to those who it may concerns. BTW, with age restriction, it's still viewable by anyone who don't bother spraying personal information to everywhere...
On 1/20/22 13:04, lkcl wrote:
On January 20, 2022 12:00:01 PM UTC, "Ferenc Éger" eegerferenc@gmail.com wrote:
Hello David,
Can you please make it available in a way that i don't have to show ID or creditcard to google?
that will be FOSDEM2022 which is 5-6 february, here is the schedule: https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/track/libre_open_vlsi_and_fpga/
l.
I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines... not my fault. I'm right now syncing it to Odysee. I'll tell you when it's done and post you the link
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:11:12 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
The problem is not with access control, but the way it's implemented. If we don't want to disclose in advance, just make it private and distribute the link in PM to those who it may concerns. BTW, with age restriction, it's still viewable by anyone who don't bother spraying personal information to everywhere...
On 1/20/22 13:04, lkcl wrote:
On January 20, 2022 12:00:01 PM UTC, "Ferenc Éger" eegerferenc@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello David,
Can you please make it available in a way that i don't have to show ID or creditcard to google?
that will be FOSDEM2022 which is 5-6 february, here is the schedule: https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/track/libre_open_vlsi_and_fpga/
l.
Hello Everyone,
"I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines..." Physical processing of silicon, as any other material, is supposed to be dangerous and videos in the topic are supposed to describe chemicals. I think it is time to do what is already done for email and repository hosting: fire up a mediagoblin[1] instance within the libresilicon.com domain.
Regards,
Ferenc
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaGoblin
On 1/20/22 16:50, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines... not my fault. I'm right now syncing it to Odysee. I'll tell you when it's done and post you the link
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:11:12 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
The problem is not with access control, but the way it's implemented. If we don't want to disclose in advance, just make it private and distribute the link in PM to those who it may concerns. BTW, with age restriction, it's still viewable by anyone who don't bother spraying personal information to everywhere...
On 1/20/22 13:04, lkcl wrote:
On January 20, 2022 12:00:01 PM UTC, "Ferenc Éger" eegerferenc@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello David,
Can you please make it available in a way that i don't have to show ID or creditcard to google?
that will be FOSDEM2022 which is 5-6 february, here is the schedule: https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/track/libre_open_vlsi_and_fpga/
l.
Hi I've uploaded it to Odysee after rerending with a sharper version of my logo. My logo contains some examples of topics I'm talking about on my channel, and some people at FOSDEM might become triggered and ree around, so I blurred it out for the FOSDEM talk. On Odysee is the version with the proper logo :-)
This will be the link, as soon as Odysee is done processing it: https://odysee.com/talk:e74c460befe30336690a7f3fc4316bd82bda4250
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:05:19 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Hello Everyone,
"I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines..." Physical processing of silicon, as any other material, is supposed to be dangerous and videos in the topic are supposed to describe chemicals. I think it is time to do what is already done for email and repository hosting: fire up a mediagoblin[1] instance within the libresilicon.com domain.
Regards,
Ferenc
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaGoblin
On 1/20/22 16:50, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines... not my fault. I'm right now syncing it to Odysee. I'll tell you when it's done and post you the link
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:11:12 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
The problem is not with access control, but the way it's implemented. If we don't want to disclose in advance, just make it private and distribute the link in PM to those who it may concerns. BTW, with age restriction, it's still viewable by anyone who don't bother spraying personal information to everywhere...
On 1/20/22 13:04, lkcl wrote:
On January 20, 2022 12:00:01 PM UTC, "Ferenc Éger" eegerferenc@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello David,
Can you please make it available in a way that i don't have to show ID or creditcard to google?
that will be FOSDEM2022 which is 5-6 february, here is the schedule: https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/track/libre_open_vlsi_and_fpga/
l.
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Thanks. It works now. I will check it out now and give feedback today if I see anything.
On 1/20/22 18:37, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
Hi I've uploaded it to Odysee after rerending with a sharper version of my logo. My logo contains some examples of topics I'm talking about on my channel, and some people at FOSDEM might become triggered and ree around, so I blurred it out for the FOSDEM talk. On Odysee is the version with the proper logo :-)
This will be the link, as soon as Odysee is done processing it: https://odysee.com/talk:e74c460befe30336690a7f3fc4316bd82bda4250
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:05:19 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Hello Everyone,
"I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines..." Physical processing of silicon, as any other material, is supposed to be dangerous and videos in the topic are supposed to describe chemicals. I think it is time to do what is already done for email and repository hosting: fire up a mediagoblin[1] instance within the libresilicon.com domain.
Regards,
Ferenc
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaGoblin
On 1/20/22 16:50, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines... not my fault. I'm right now syncing it to Odysee. I'll tell you when it's done and post you the link
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:11:12 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
The problem is not with access control, but the way it's implemented. If we don't want to disclose in advance, just make it private and distribute the link in PM to those who it may concerns. BTW, with age restriction, it's still viewable by anyone who don't bother spraying personal information to everywhere...
On 1/20/22 13:04, lkcl wrote:
On January 20, 2022 12:00:01 PM UTC, "Ferenc Éger" eegerferenc@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello David,
Can you please make it available in a way that i don't have to show ID or creditcard to google?
that will be FOSDEM2022 which is 5-6 february, here is the schedule: https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/track/libre_open_vlsi_and_fpga/
l.
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
OK!
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 6:10:13 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Thanks. It works now. I will check it out now and give feedback today if I see anything.
On 1/20/22 18:37, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
Hi I've uploaded it to Odysee after rerending with a sharper version of my logo. My logo contains some examples of topics I'm talking about on my channel, and some people at FOSDEM might become triggered and ree around, so I blurred it out for the FOSDEM talk. On Odysee is the version with the proper logo :-)
This will be the link, as soon as Odysee is done processing it: https://odysee.com/talk:e74c460befe30336690a7f3fc4316bd82bda4250
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:05:19 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Hello Everyone,
"I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines..." Physical processing of silicon, as any other material, is supposed to be dangerous and videos in the topic are supposed to describe chemicals. I think it is time to do what is already done for email and repository hosting: fire up a mediagoblin[1] instance within the libresilicon.com domain.
Regards,
Ferenc
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaGoblin
On 1/20/22 16:50, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines... not my fault. I'm right now syncing it to Odysee. I'll tell you when it's done and post you the link
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:11:12 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
The problem is not with access control, but the way it's implemented. If we don't want to disclose in advance, just make it private and distribute the link in PM to those who it may concerns. BTW, with age restriction, it's still viewable by anyone who don't bother spraying personal information to everywhere...
On 1/20/22 13:04, lkcl wrote:
On January 20, 2022 12:00:01 PM UTC, "Ferenc Éger" eegerferenc@gmail.com
wrote:
> Hello David, > > > Can you please make it available in a way that i don't have to show > ID > or creditcard to google?
that will be FOSDEM2022 which is 5-6 february, here is the schedule: https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/track/libre_open_vlsi_and_fpga/
l.
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Hello David,
I reviewed the talk. It is mostly OK. However, as usual, I have some recommendations (if it fits into the deadline):
At 03:04, it is stated that would-be small startups are the intended users of the process (and also implied as the means of "small players" to access the technology). This is a good approach at first, as this puts a real-life check on the economic feasibility of providing a small-scale manufacturing service. But it raises the following question: entrepreneurs will try this if it seems to be economically viable, if demand is already there, but the demand will remain latent as long as no-one tries to provide it (since low-volume custom manufacturing is now considered to be infeasible, which is a cardinal blocking point in itself). How to resolve this chicken-and-egg? Maybe we will use our would-be lab to become a pilot provider? Whether yes or no, this contradiction and the way to resolve it should be mentioned here (referred as with the buzzword "driving the paradigm shift"/"Drive the adoption of these nodes"/"Elaborate novel business models" on the website).
As for the website: our roadmap (with the demos) didn't show up. Is it intentional?
At 03:42, I think, the part beginning with the taxpayer money up to the sticks in Italian is too political, falling in the same category of why the logo is blurred in the release version.
At 05:42, the book invokes for me the proverb "Who knows and understands, does it, who knows but doesn't understand, teaches it, who neither knows nor understands, writes a book of it". I would advertise it only if it is on the print...
At 26:18, I would also mention vacuum evaporation. Not as simple in construction as sputtering, but it's a much older technology (so easier to find second-hand equipment) and also simpler to design I suppose.
Regards,
Ferenc
On 1/20/22 19:52, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
OK!
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 6:10:13 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Thanks. It works now. I will check it out now and give feedback today if I see anything.
On 1/20/22 18:37, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
Hi I've uploaded it to Odysee after rerending with a sharper version of my logo. My logo contains some examples of topics I'm talking about on my channel, and some people at FOSDEM might become triggered and ree around, so I blurred it out for the FOSDEM talk. On Odysee is the version with the proper logo :-)
This will be the link, as soon as Odysee is done processing it: https://odysee.com/talk:e74c460befe30336690a7f3fc4316bd82bda4250
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:05:19 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Hello Everyone,
"I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines..." Physical processing of silicon, as any other material, is supposed to be dangerous and videos in the topic are supposed to describe chemicals. I think it is time to do what is already done for email and repository hosting: fire up a mediagoblin[1] instance within the libresilicon.com domain.
Regards,
Ferenc
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaGoblin
On 1/20/22 16:50, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines... not my fault. I'm right now syncing it to Odysee. I'll tell you when it's done and post you the link
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:11:12 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
The problem is not with access control, but the way it's implemented. If we don't want to disclose in advance, just make it private and distribute the link in PM to those who it may concerns. BTW, with age restriction, it's still viewable by anyone who don't bother spraying personal information to everywhere...
On 1/20/22 13:04, lkcl wrote: > On January 20, 2022 12:00:01 PM UTC, "Ferenc Éger" > eegerferenc@gmail.com
wrote:
>> Hello David, >> >> >> Can you please make it available in a way that i don't have to show >> ID >> or creditcard to google? > that will be FOSDEM2022 which is 5-6 february, here is the schedule: > https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/track/libre_open_vlsi_and_fpga/ > > l.
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Hi Thanks for the feedback, however, the 21st (so today) is the deadline. As far as I understood, all the videos are now set and in the review phase... When it comes to the point I make, that it's essentially fascist, that governments are paying large semiconductor manufacturers, I stand by that statement and will keep it in there :-) I only covered the most common deposition machines, in order to provide a basic overview, because my talk was limited to an hour. When it comes to the feasibility to start your own startup small volume foundry, this is for any startup to decide on their own.
Cheers -lev
On Friday, January 21, 2022 1:41:45 AM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Hello David,
I reviewed the talk. It is mostly OK. However, as usual, I have some recommendations (if it fits into the deadline):
At 03:04, it is stated that would-be small startups are the intended users of the process (and also implied as the means of "small players" to access the technology). This is a good approach at first, as this puts a real-life check on the economic feasibility of providing a small-scale manufacturing service. But it raises the following question: entrepreneurs will try this if it seems to be economically viable, if demand is already there, but the demand will remain latent as long as no-one tries to provide it (since low-volume custom manufacturing is now considered to be infeasible, which is a cardinal blocking point in itself). How to resolve this chicken-and-egg? Maybe we will use our would-be lab to become a pilot provider? Whether yes or no, this contradiction and the way to resolve it should be mentioned here (referred as with the buzzword "driving the paradigm shift"/"Drive the adoption of these nodes"/"Elaborate novel business models" on the website).
As for the website: our roadmap (with the demos) didn't show up. Is it intentional?
At 03:42, I think, the part beginning with the taxpayer money up to the sticks in Italian is too political, falling in the same category of why the logo is blurred in the release version.
At 05:42, the book invokes for me the proverb "Who knows and understands, does it, who knows but doesn't understand, teaches it, who neither knows nor understands, writes a book of it". I would advertise it only if it is on the print...
At 26:18, I would also mention vacuum evaporation. Not as simple in construction as sputtering, but it's a much older technology (so easier to find second-hand equipment) and also simpler to design I suppose.
Regards,
Ferenc
On 1/20/22 19:52, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
OK!
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 6:10:13 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Thanks. It works now. I will check it out now and give feedback today if I see anything.
On 1/20/22 18:37, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
Hi I've uploaded it to Odysee after rerending with a sharper version of my logo. My logo contains some examples of topics I'm talking about on my channel, and some people at FOSDEM might become triggered and ree around, so I blurred it out for the FOSDEM talk. On Odysee is the version with the proper logo :-)
This will be the link, as soon as Odysee is done processing it: https://odysee.com/talk:e74c460befe30336690a7f3fc4316bd82bda4250
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:05:19 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Hello Everyone,
"I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines..." Physical processing of silicon, as any other material, is supposed to be dangerous and videos in the topic are supposed to describe chemicals. I think it is time to do what is already done for email and repository hosting: fire up a mediagoblin[1] instance within the libresilicon.com domain.
Regards,
Ferenc
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaGoblin
On 1/20/22 16:50, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines... not my fault. I'm right now syncing it to Odysee. I'll tell you when it's done and post you the link
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:11:12 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote: > The problem is not with access control, but the way it's implemented. > If > we don't want to disclose in advance, just make it private and > distribute the link in PM to those who it may concerns. BTW, with age > restriction, it's still viewable by anyone who don't bother spraying > personal information to everywhere... > > On 1/20/22 13:04, lkcl wrote: >> On January 20, 2022 12:00:01 PM UTC, "Ferenc Éger" >> eegerferenc@gmail.com
wrote: >>> Hello David, >>> >>> >>> Can you please make it available in a way that i don't have to show >>> ID >>> or creditcard to google? >> >> that will be FOSDEM2022 which is 5-6 february, here is the schedule: >> https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/track/libre_open_vlsi_and_fpga/ >> >> l.
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Also, it's about how to use the process and scale it, it's not supposed to be a business pitch. We've got the roadmap on the webiste :-)
Cheers -lev
On Friday, January 21, 2022 1:41:45 AM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Hello David,
I reviewed the talk. It is mostly OK. However, as usual, I have some recommendations (if it fits into the deadline):
At 03:04, it is stated that would-be small startups are the intended users of the process (and also implied as the means of "small players" to access the technology). This is a good approach at first, as this puts a real-life check on the economic feasibility of providing a small-scale manufacturing service. But it raises the following question: entrepreneurs will try this if it seems to be economically viable, if demand is already there, but the demand will remain latent as long as no-one tries to provide it (since low-volume custom manufacturing is now considered to be infeasible, which is a cardinal blocking point in itself). How to resolve this chicken-and-egg? Maybe we will use our would-be lab to become a pilot provider? Whether yes or no, this contradiction and the way to resolve it should be mentioned here (referred as with the buzzword "driving the paradigm shift"/"Drive the adoption of these nodes"/"Elaborate novel business models" on the website).
As for the website: our roadmap (with the demos) didn't show up. Is it intentional?
At 03:42, I think, the part beginning with the taxpayer money up to the sticks in Italian is too political, falling in the same category of why the logo is blurred in the release version.
At 05:42, the book invokes for me the proverb "Who knows and understands, does it, who knows but doesn't understand, teaches it, who neither knows nor understands, writes a book of it". I would advertise it only if it is on the print...
At 26:18, I would also mention vacuum evaporation. Not as simple in construction as sputtering, but it's a much older technology (so easier to find second-hand equipment) and also simpler to design I suppose.
Regards,
Ferenc
On 1/20/22 19:52, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
OK!
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 6:10:13 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Thanks. It works now. I will check it out now and give feedback today if I see anything.
On 1/20/22 18:37, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
Hi I've uploaded it to Odysee after rerending with a sharper version of my logo. My logo contains some examples of topics I'm talking about on my channel, and some people at FOSDEM might become triggered and ree around, so I blurred it out for the FOSDEM talk. On Odysee is the version with the proper logo :-)
This will be the link, as soon as Odysee is done processing it: https://odysee.com/talk:e74c460befe30336690a7f3fc4316bd82bda4250
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:05:19 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Hello Everyone,
"I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines..." Physical processing of silicon, as any other material, is supposed to be dangerous and videos in the topic are supposed to describe chemicals. I think it is time to do what is already done for email and repository hosting: fire up a mediagoblin[1] instance within the libresilicon.com domain.
Regards,
Ferenc
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaGoblin
On 1/20/22 16:50, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines... not my fault. I'm right now syncing it to Odysee. I'll tell you when it's done and post you the link
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:11:12 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote: > The problem is not with access control, but the way it's implemented. > If > we don't want to disclose in advance, just make it private and > distribute the link in PM to those who it may concerns. BTW, with age > restriction, it's still viewable by anyone who don't bother spraying > personal information to everywhere... > > On 1/20/22 13:04, lkcl wrote: >> On January 20, 2022 12:00:01 PM UTC, "Ferenc Éger" >> eegerferenc@gmail.com
wrote: >>> Hello David, >>> >>> >>> Can you please make it available in a way that i don't have to show >>> ID >>> or creditcard to google? >> >> that will be FOSDEM2022 which is 5-6 february, here is the schedule: >> https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/track/libre_open_vlsi_and_fpga/ >> >> l.
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
So I've checked and the video has already been reviewed and accepted. I'd have to sit down and record additional parts of the video, cut, rerender and re-submit it. I'll add a better demo video for the spin coater, will record some short examples on how to use QFlow and OpenLANE and then try to re-upload, but no promises.
Cheers -lev
On Friday, January 21, 2022 4:28:33 AM WET David Lanzendörfer wrote:
Also, it's about how to use the process and scale it, it's not supposed to be a business pitch. We've got the roadmap on the webiste :-)
Cheers -lev
On Friday, January 21, 2022 1:41:45 AM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Hello David,
I reviewed the talk. It is mostly OK. However, as usual, I have some recommendations (if it fits into the deadline):
At 03:04, it is stated that would-be small startups are the intended users of the process (and also implied as the means of "small players" to access the technology). This is a good approach at first, as this puts a real-life check on the economic feasibility of providing a small-scale manufacturing service. But it raises the following question: entrepreneurs will try this if it seems to be economically viable, if demand is already there, but the demand will remain latent as long as no-one tries to provide it (since low-volume custom manufacturing is now considered to be infeasible, which is a cardinal blocking point in itself). How to resolve this chicken-and-egg? Maybe we will use our would-be lab to become a pilot provider? Whether yes or no, this contradiction and the way to resolve it should be mentioned here (referred as with the buzzword "driving the paradigm shift"/"Drive the adoption of these nodes"/"Elaborate novel business models" on the website).
As for the website: our roadmap (with the demos) didn't show up. Is it intentional?
At 03:42, I think, the part beginning with the taxpayer money up to the sticks in Italian is too political, falling in the same category of why the logo is blurred in the release version.
At 05:42, the book invokes for me the proverb "Who knows and understands, does it, who knows but doesn't understand, teaches it, who neither knows nor understands, writes a book of it". I would advertise it only if it is on the print...
At 26:18, I would also mention vacuum evaporation. Not as simple in construction as sputtering, but it's a much older technology (so easier to find second-hand equipment) and also simpler to design I suppose.
Regards,
Ferenc
On 1/20/22 19:52, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
OK!
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 6:10:13 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Thanks. It works now. I will check it out now and give feedback today if I see anything.
On 1/20/22 18:37, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
Hi I've uploaded it to Odysee after rerending with a sharper version of my logo. My logo contains some examples of topics I'm talking about on my channel, and some people at FOSDEM might become triggered and ree around, so I blurred it out for the FOSDEM talk. On Odysee is the version with the proper logo :-)
This will be the link, as soon as Odysee is done processing it: https://odysee.com/talk:e74c460befe30336690a7f3fc4316bd82bda4250
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:05:19 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Hello Everyone,
"I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines..." Physical processing of silicon, as any other material, is supposed to be dangerous and videos in the topic are supposed to describe chemicals. I think it is time to do what is already done for email and repository hosting: fire up a mediagoblin[1] instance within the libresilicon.com domain.
Regards,
Ferenc
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaGoblin
On 1/20/22 16:50, David Lanzendörfer wrote: > I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals > and > dangerous stuff. > It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines... not my fault. > I'm right now syncing it to Odysee. > I'll tell you when it's done and post you the link > > Cheers > -lev > > On Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:11:12 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote: >> The problem is not with access control, but the way it's >> implemented. >> If >> we don't want to disclose in advance, just make it private and >> distribute the link in PM to those who it may concerns. BTW, with >> age >> restriction, it's still viewable by anyone who don't bother >> spraying >> personal information to everywhere... >> >> On 1/20/22 13:04, lkcl wrote: >>> On January 20, 2022 12:00:01 PM UTC, "Ferenc Éger" >>> eegerferenc@gmail.com > > wrote: >>>> Hello David, >>>> >>>> >>>> Can you please make it available in a way that i don't have to >>>> show >>>> ID >>>> or creditcard to google? >>> >>> that will be FOSDEM2022 which is 5-6 february, here is the >>> schedule: >>> https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/track/libre_open_vlsi_and_fpga/ >>> >>> l.
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developer s
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Hi I just noticed that before my talk on how to actually run the process flow, there are already two videos planned here, on Coriolis and eFabless, which means, all the tools I've mentioned would be also provided in our toolchain will already be introduced, so there's really no need for me to repeat stuff from the other two videos, Ferenc: https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/room/dopen_hardware
I will keep making videos however and will upload them to this dedicated channel, and then embed them on the website: https://odysee.com/@LibreSilicon:8
BTW: Would be cool, if you'd be looking into Kdenlive as well and would as well get a hang on video editing, so that I'm not the only one producing content :-)
Cheers -lev
On Friday, January 21, 2022 1:41:45 AM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Hello David,
I reviewed the talk. It is mostly OK. However, as usual, I have some recommendations (if it fits into the deadline):
At 03:04, it is stated that would-be small startups are the intended users of the process (and also implied as the means of "small players" to access the technology). This is a good approach at first, as this puts a real-life check on the economic feasibility of providing a small-scale manufacturing service. But it raises the following question: entrepreneurs will try this if it seems to be economically viable, if demand is already there, but the demand will remain latent as long as no-one tries to provide it (since low-volume custom manufacturing is now considered to be infeasible, which is a cardinal blocking point in itself). How to resolve this chicken-and-egg? Maybe we will use our would-be lab to become a pilot provider? Whether yes or no, this contradiction and the way to resolve it should be mentioned here (referred as with the buzzword "driving the paradigm shift"/"Drive the adoption of these nodes"/"Elaborate novel business models" on the website).
As for the website: our roadmap (with the demos) didn't show up. Is it intentional?
At 03:42, I think, the part beginning with the taxpayer money up to the sticks in Italian is too political, falling in the same category of why the logo is blurred in the release version.
At 05:42, the book invokes for me the proverb "Who knows and understands, does it, who knows but doesn't understand, teaches it, who neither knows nor understands, writes a book of it". I would advertise it only if it is on the print...
At 26:18, I would also mention vacuum evaporation. Not as simple in construction as sputtering, but it's a much older technology (so easier to find second-hand equipment) and also simpler to design I suppose.
Regards,
Ferenc
On 1/20/22 19:52, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
OK!
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 6:10:13 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Thanks. It works now. I will check it out now and give feedback today if I see anything.
On 1/20/22 18:37, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
Hi I've uploaded it to Odysee after rerending with a sharper version of my logo. My logo contains some examples of topics I'm talking about on my channel, and some people at FOSDEM might become triggered and ree around, so I blurred it out for the FOSDEM talk. On Odysee is the version with the proper logo :-)
This will be the link, as soon as Odysee is done processing it: https://odysee.com/talk:e74c460befe30336690a7f3fc4316bd82bda4250
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 4:05:19 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
Hello Everyone,
"I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines..." Physical processing of silicon, as any other material, is supposed to be dangerous and videos in the topic are supposed to describe chemicals. I think it is time to do what is already done for email and repository hosting: fire up a mediagoblin[1] instance within the libresilicon.com domain.
Regards,
Ferenc
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaGoblin
On 1/20/22 16:50, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines... not my fault. I'm right now syncing it to Odysee. I'll tell you when it's done and post you the link
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:11:12 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote: > The problem is not with access control, but the way it's implemented. > If > we don't want to disclose in advance, just make it private and > distribute the link in PM to those who it may concerns. BTW, with age > restriction, it's still viewable by anyone who don't bother spraying > personal information to everywhere... > > On 1/20/22 13:04, lkcl wrote: >> On January 20, 2022 12:00:01 PM UTC, "Ferenc Éger" >> eegerferenc@gmail.com
wrote: >>> Hello David, >>> >>> >>> Can you please make it available in a way that i don't have to show >>> ID >>> or creditcard to google? >> >> that will be FOSDEM2022 which is 5-6 february, here is the schedule: >> https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/track/libre_open_vlsi_and_fpga/ >> >> l.
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
Nice!
the video clip showing how a spin coater works faded to black too early, leaving the part where it's actually running only partially visible. also there are several seconds where it's just sitting there doing nothing, so maybe you started and stopped too early in the video you extracted the clip from?
iirc Applied Science on youtube has some nice spin coater clips if you need them: https://youtu.be/321tptQ8PrU
Jacob
Thanks for the tip! I'll make some additional videos going into detail on the different points, in the future. I'll keep that in mind.
Cheers-lev
On Friday, January 21, 2022 4:00:29 AM WET Jacob Lifshay wrote:
Nice!
the video clip showing how a spin coater works faded to black too early, leaving the part where it's actually running only partially visible. also there are several seconds where it's just sitting there doing nothing, so maybe you started and stopped too early in the video you extracted the clip from?
iirc Applied Science on youtube has some nice spin coater clips if you need them: https://youtu.be/321tptQ8PrU
Jacob
On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 17:05 +0100, Ferenc Éger wrote:
Hello Everyone,
"I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines..." Physical processing of silicon, as any other material, is supposed to be dangerous and videos in the topic are supposed to describe chemicals. I think it is time to do what is already done for email and repository hosting: fire up a mediagoblin[1] instance within the
I have a private instance of mediagoblin, where I upload mostly music as I am a hobbiest composer/vocasynth producer.
libresilicon.com domain.
Regards,
Ferenc
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaGoblin
On 1/20/22 16:50, David Lanzendörfer wrote:
I had to do this for legal reasons, because I talk about chemicals and dangerous stuff. It's the braindamaged YouTube guidelines... not my fault. I'm right now syncing it to Odysee. I'll tell you when it's done and post you the link
Cheers -lev
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:11:12 PM WET Ferenc Éger wrote:
The problem is not with access control, but the way it's implemented. If we don't want to disclose in advance, just make it private and distribute the link in PM to those who it may concerns. BTW, with age restriction, it's still viewable by anyone who don't bother spraying personal information to everywhere...
On 1/20/22 13:04, lkcl wrote:
On January 20, 2022 12:00:01 PM UTC, "Ferenc Éger" < eegerferenc@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello David,
Can you please make it available in a way that i don't have to show ID or creditcard to google?
that will be FOSDEM2022 which is 5-6 february, here is the schedule: https://fosdem.org/2022/schedule/track/libre_open_vlsi_and_fpga/
l.
Libresilicon-developers mailing list Libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com https://list.libresilicon.com/mailman/listinfo/libresilicon-developers
libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com
-
David Lanzendörfer -
Ferenc Éger -
Jacob Lifshay -
lkcl -
Tobias Platen