[Libre-silicon-devel] Netlist and LVS for PearlRiver
David Lanzendörfer
david.lanzendoerfer at o2s.ch
Sat Aug 4 17:59:20 CEST 2018
Hi Hagen
So now after going through your layout and researching the layers it turns out
we can perfectly map your layout to our process:
https://www.eda.ncsu.edu/wiki/MOSIS_Layers
The only thing which is missing are pwells.
After lots of thinking I just realized that this is the only problem.
Because the active area is way smaller than the nwell/pwell anyway we're not
in any danger of building junctions outside of the island.
Also: When we run the STI etching after diffusion any offset in alignment
won't be a problem because of the spacing between the active area and the
outer edge of the nwell/pwell.
So we can just expose the pwell and nwell mask for the STI isolation etch.
I've started to add pwells, please have a look at my pull request:
https://github.com/chipforge/PearlRiver/pull/2
Cheers
David
> I did not look carefully enough and thought all metal1 was shorted between
> center ground pin and the other pins. I know principle of 4-point
> measurement also called force/sense. I have problem figuring out how it is
> applicable to this design. Could you give example for one of the structures
> which pads are used for force and which for sense ? You may not be able to
> simulate structure exactly but you can use some assumed values to see if
> measurement procedure will actually work. Best to include all (parasitic)
> junctions in such simulation. Speaking from experience they often can cause
> problems when sharing pins when they are unwanted biased in forward.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://list.libresilicon.com/pipermail/libre-silicon-devel/attachments/20180804/b2a900f7/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the Libre-silicon-devel
mailing list