libresilicon.com
Sign In Sign Up
Manage this list Sign In Sign Up

Keyboard Shortcuts

Thread View

  • j: Next unread message
  • k: Previous unread message
  • j a: Jump to all threads
  • j l: Jump to MailingList overview

Libresilicon-developers

Thread Start a new thread
Download
Threads by month
  • ----- 2025 -----
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2024 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2023 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2022 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2021 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2020 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2019 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
  • January
  • ----- 2018 -----
  • December
  • November
  • October
  • September
  • August
  • July
  • June
  • May
  • April
  • March
  • February
libresilicon-developers@list.libresilicon.com

June 2020

  • 2 participants
  • 1 discussions
Competition to LS: Skywater 130nm production-ready PDK gets opensourced
by Éger Ferenc 21 Jun '20

21 Jun '20
Hello Everyone! I just came along this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23524428 Wrap-up: Google and Skywater partner up to provide an open-source PDK (incl. primitive library and models, mostly what we do) for an actually existing technology node. Compared to LS1U, MFS is 130nm, voltage range is 1,8V core + 3,3-5V IO, HV MOS and SONOS is also available. What seem to be differentiating factors are: - Only the PDK is open, the process steps not. Proprietary single-source tech. with no geographical diversity - Commercial mask-based volume-optimized foundry with the usual pain-in-the-ass for MPW projects (expensive for the general public, takes too long) - Made-in-USA with DoD accreditation (can attract US govt customers, but hmm-hmm... otherwise) At the end, if we wish to underline the importance and necessity of our work, we may need to put more emphasis on maskless lithography and a business model geared towards unique, fast, cheap (i.e. comparable to a catalog component) single-piece orders. Regards, Ferenc
2 1
0 0

HyperKitty Powered by HyperKitty version 1.3.12.