Hi
Fascinating - did you point out to them that their hatred is a violation of the conduct that they seek to uphold? Or that it ISN'T on their list of proscribed behaviours?
I would be interested to hear how high the resultant mental mushroom cloud reaches... :)
Usually the debate goes like this: "But you're right now hateful against me an falsely accuse me of 'hating women', which is in no way related to me refusing to use the word 'they' in singular, because it's just grammatically *wrong*."
Then the answer is: No! Hate can only come from white people towards people of different ethnicity!
Then I: But that's not only a wrong but also in itself racist definition...
Then them: No! Racism can only be from white people towards people of different...
Me: Blocks them on Twitter.
Sometimes it's also enough to quote Mao. It's fun to observe how wanna-be Marxists deal with an actual Maoist :D
Thank god for that. I have spoken to dozens of people about this. It seems to be that they have a failure of *desire* to comprehend how dangerous these toxic documents are. They will do absolutely any amount of mental avoidance tricks as a way to not face the issue. It is really quite fascinating.
Exactly. Like bill C-16.
-lev