Hi everyone
So yesterday in the meeting, we came across the problem, that we need
to deposit metal onto our silicon oxide.
There already has been progress from hobbyists on building home made
Magnetron sputtering setups:
https://transmitter.ieee.org/makerproject/view/9ce06
I think I will replicate this project (and others like it) and bring it into a
form, in which I can use it in my garage. for depositing a Nickel layer.
Opinions?
Cheers
-lev
Hello List!
This is our weekly announcement for the next Mumble Sessions on Sunday
2021-05-16 @ 18:00 UTC.
Please join us as usual at our Mumble Server murmur.libresilicon.com at
Port 64738, the Channel is IC.
We like to follow-up our topics from mumble sessions before:
- DMD chips for the Stepper
- Glove Box
- NLnet (virtual) Workshop
- etc.
Regards,
Hagen.
Hi everyone
So at the 18th May from 15-16h CEST there will be a virtual workshop happen,
organized by NLNet and NG Zero:
https://nlnet.nl/news/2021/20210507-NGI-Zero-workshop-open-hardware.html
I'll be showing a 10 slide presentation on my strategy of setting up a micro
chip foundry in the basement, using glove boxes with a closed loop system.
In case you've got some input and ideas on what to also talk about in my
10 minutes, please come forward, I'm looking forward to your input :-)
Cheers
-lev
Hi
So Hagen apparently has been going full speed OCD into the selection of
components for our stepper, of which the findings we will discuss tomorrow
in our weekly Mumble session (murmur.libresilicon.com, 1800Z, -> UTC <-).
I've been looking through the data sheet of the controller for the 4k DMD
chip[1] and it turns out, that it's already the most suitable micro controller
possible.
I think we should just try to use the features available in KiCAD, for routing
impendance controlled differential line pairs[2].
If those features are good enough for CERN, they should be good enough
for us.
I already once did successfully DDR3 RAM for an embedded device with
KiCAD, so it's possible.
I think it's the easiest to just use the controller from Texas Instruments,
because the DLPC6540 comes with a USB interface, so we'd basically be
done and just have to plug it into the computer used to control the stepping.
About the x-y-System, Hagen has been talking about, I'm already working
on that end for a while.
I ended up with a gear shift design (I guess the Swiss genetics is coming
forward again here. Yikes. LOL) and a laser distance measuring system to
compensate for missed steps.
Cheers
-lev
[1] https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/dlpc6540.pdf?ts=1620316149365
[2] https://forum.kicad.info/t/differencial-pair-impedance-calculator/4178
Hi
So Hagen and I have been going through potential candidates for the DMD chips
and looking at the interfaces, which are super complex.
Anything above 1080p is not usable anymore with a reasonable PCB layouting
effort from our side.
https://www.ti.com/dlp-chip/display-and-projection/pico-chipsets/getting-st…
Hagen is right now going through the diverse chips and we will discuss
his findings next week.
Until then, we should already start discussing the lens system.
What we need are lenses which make a focus roughly 1 cm away from the lens,
I'd say, we're going for a projector design for now, because the micro mirrors
still are of a size below our target feature size, so we've got to magnify the
pattern.
According to the DMD data sheets, a visible UV LED should work just fine
with it.
https://pt.mouser.com/ProductDetail/OSRAM-Opto-Semiconductors/GD-CSSRM214-A…
Would be cool to have Shaktor on the mailing list here :-)
Cheers
-lev
Hi,
- spin coating
I finally tried to build a makeshift spin coater the way Sam Zeloof did, by
mounting a plastic can on top of a CPU fan (actually a case fan from
another device I had lying around). I can't say this is the way to go...
the fan is way too weak to spin the can at a meaningful speed. It is also
very hard to center the can exactly, so it wobbles a lot and that probably
reduces the speed even more. Mounting a die without a container would allow
the fan to spin faster, but would likely clog the fan with chemicals in no
time. I'll next try my original idea, to mount the can to an axle that I'll
stick into a power drill.
One thing I did find out is that the coating liquid should be evenly
applied before spinning. It will NOT spread to the whole surface by itself,
but rather run to a single direction in a concentrated stream, probably due
to surface tension.
- chemicals
I did find this resist which is meant for PCB etching, so I don't know yet
whether it has some kind of "grain size" that limits the resolution. The
datasheet explicitly states that it can take up to 40% hydrofluoric acid,
though, and be used for glass etching (so I hope it will actually stick to
glass). It is also liquid until soft-baking, so spin-coating should be
possible.
https://www.reichelt.de/fotopositiv-resist-positiv-20-200-ml-kontakt-235-p9…
WRT hydrofluoric acid, there is something called "glass etching cream", the
best-known brand being "Armour Etch". This contains fluorides, i.e. HF
salts, is *somewhat* safer than HF itself (less fumes I think, but don't
get it on your skin), and can be ordered by private individuals. The
downside is that I could not find any information on whether it contains an
abrasive.
- photolithography
Sam Zeloof used a modified DLP projector for his litho setup. He either
used magic to do that or chose exactly the right projector. I took apart a
used DLP and the UV filter is the only thing that could be taken out
without destroying the projector. The color wheel, and even more so the
optics, are buried under tons of other stuff, most of which is glued
together. Also, the optics path itself is mostly glued. So I think David's
plan of taking the DMD chip and building his own optics setup is a far
better idea than modding a projector.
To me as a layman in these things, stiching a larger image together from
multiple images with a stepper sounds more logical than using multiple DMD
chips. This XY table is cheap and has stepper motors that can position the
table in increments of 5 microns. I have actually wondered if a first
prototype should use a DMD at all, or just focus a single UV LED and "draw"
by moving the XY table.
https://www.amazon.de/Proxxon-27100-MICRO-Koordinatentisch-KT/dp/B000S81MHY
- strategy
I also thought a bit about who would be interested in making your own
chips. High-volume production has far better, established processes, and
low-volume production would use an FPGA or other off-the-shelf parts.
Silicon testing before production isn't useful when the process is
different. This leaves education and hobbyists. In other words, a free
silicon process must be sustainable based solely on education and
hobbyists, otherwise it won't stand a chance.
There is another problem that goes in the same direction: a "democratized"
chip making process should not rely on actors like INL, because there are
too few of them -- less than 10 in the whole of Europe. Even if INL agrees
to host the LibreSilicon process, a single decision by INL that chip making
isn't interesting anymore can shut the whole thing down.
I'm not particularly enthusiatic about the "glove box" idea either because
I don't think it is practical, nor doable in a useful price range.
The usual answer to the "expensive tools" problem is shared labs, usually
as "fab labs", "makerspaces" or similar. I think this is a way in which
chip making could actually work, especially if it works on dual-use tools
that benefit a makerspace in other ways, like an XY table, microscope etc.
I wanted to contact a local makerspace in my town, but unfortunately
Germany just went into full Covid lockdown, so it's going to take a while
until that.
Greetings,
Martin
Hello List!
This is our weekly announcement for the next Mumble Sessions on Sunday
2021-05-02 @ 18:00 UTC.
Please join us as usual at our Mumble Server murmur.libresilicon.com at
Port 64738, the Channel is IC.
We like to follow-up our topics from mumble sessions before.
Regards,
Hagen.
Hello List.
A couple of Mumble Sessions before we talked about our Glove Box design
once again..
Well, one action item was to figure out, how we can verify the clean
room quality inside the Glove Box. And I remembered some nice handy-size
Analyzer I saw already for this purpose (to check 'dirtyness' behind
machines in the productive clean room behind machines or to check air
flow in and outs).
Fortunately, due to German Engineering Art in cheating with diesel
engines (Volkswagen, Audi etc..) "fine dust" is a big topic nowadays.
Okay, is was joke..
But, instruments to measure the fine dust in our daily environment, in
cities along heavy used streets or so, are already available in bigger
super markets like Kaufland here in Germany now. And this instruments
offers 2 fine dust classes - one with 10 Micron and another with 2.5
Micron particle size. Of course, this is still a dimension away from
particle sizes which matters for real clean room classes - regardless of
which clean room class system (ISO 14644-1 or US Federal Standard 209 E)
we are looking at.
Anyway, IMHO this instruments are a great and quite reasonable priced
step into particle measurements at all :-)
The mentioned super market has currently an offer round about 200 Euros;
on ebay.com similar instruments are available from 150 Euros upwards.
Maybe we can even "update" the firmware on such a instrument for smaller
particle sizes :-o
Regards,
Hagen.
Hello List!
This is our weekly announcement for the next Mumble Sessions on Sunday
2021-04-25 @ 18:00 UTC.
Please join us as usual at our Mumble Server murmur.libresilicon.com at
Port 64738, the Channel is IC.
We like to follow-up our topics from mumble sessions before.
Regards,
Hagen.
Hi
So turns out there's another way to achieve higher resolutions (below 100nm),
without having to use EUV light and low pressure.
You can give your exposure unit a nice bath :-)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immersion_lithography
What do you folks think? Worth considering putting on our TODO list for future
stepper iterations?
Cheers
-lev